“I don’t have time to write a blog” – the dawn of the content engineer

People are increasingly recognising the need to use social media to promote their company, but when faced with the prospect of writing a daily blog or tweeting on a regular basis, lack of time is a quickly cited as a barrier to even getting started. This is particularly the case if the person is not already part of the marketing or communications teams.

Citing lack of time clearly links to the perceived value of regularly conducting such activity. People generally find time for things they think will benefit them.

The results from blogging aren’t immediate

The big problem is that the results from blogging or tweeting aren’t usually immediate – social media is about using content to build relationships and this can take time. On a day to day basis it’s often not clear which blog or twitter topic is the one that will make the most difference. You can blog for weeks and not seem to make an impact.

But as companies point out, if they are going to invest in this space they need a clear idea that they will get a return.

It comes back to the old adage in marketing – ‘only 50% of marketing works, the question is which 50%?’ This applies just as much to social media marketing.

Some look to consultancies to direct them to what is guaranteed to work, but this is rarely possible as the audience for every business or brand is different even in the same sector. The real-time nature of the web makes it notoriously difficult to predict behaviour.

Businesses who have made the step into social media marketing are increasingly using monitoring and analytics tools to ‘listen’ to their audience and get some kind of indication of the impact of their work.

Who is best placed in an organisation to engage in social media?

Linking this to your social media activity is relatively straight forward when there just one or two of you in a business. It’s easy to keep track of the blog, twitter, Facebook etc.

Problems arise when you’re a big corporate with different products, divisions etc. It becomes impossible. The big question is who within the organisation is best placed to listen and manage / engage in social media in order to generate maximum awareness, engagement and ultimately sales?

This is leading to a new kind of marketer who works across the business:

The content engineeer

Pelin Thorogood blogged about the idea of the content engineer. In Pelin’s words this “is a marketer who engineers and optimises the many forms of content required to engage customer 2.0, based on the data presented by the many analysis tools. eg:

  • Social-media monitoring and analysis give them the pulse on buyer sentiments on brands, products, and ad campaigns.
  • Web analytics tell them which content is engaging which type of visitor from which source.
  • Search engine optimisation tools present them with the right keywords to include on the web site to improve page rank (and thus findability) with search engines.

Leveraging all the social and behavioral intelligence available to them, content engineers develop and apply the right content, at the right time, to engage the right audience in the most effective manner possible.”

This is great thinking as it is clear the value in social media is generated through content.

But it starts to put a framework around how you can optimise this content to get the best results for your business and who should do this.

It shows how your time spent in social media marketing can be used most effectively, so you can start to see the value in what you do.

iCrossing CCO joins Qube

We are delighted to announce  that Dean Harvey, previously Chief Commercial Officer at global digital agency iCrossing, joined Qube as Client Services Director this week.

His role will be to increase client satisfaction and the client base, implement and streamline processes and contribute to the overall strategy of the company.

Dean is an industry veteran, with more than 15 years in executive management. Before joining Qube, in his role at iCrossing, he managed sales, clients and all things commercial, helping take the original business Spannerworks from 12 people to sale.

It’s fantastic to have Dean on board, it’s a great coup. His experience working with brands at the highest level will prove invaluable in achieving our goal of giving our clients the very best experience.

Dean told me Qube excited him for a number of reasons, not least the opportunity to join an amazingly creative and intelligent team – agile in our approach to helping our customers get the best results through social media. He is passionate about business and saw in Qube an opportunity to build on our excellent customer base and help to grow the company, drawing on his previous experience.

Google+ is open for business

That means, as Google announced via it’s blog on Monday, that Google + is now accepting pages for Organisations, businesses and brands. Allowing them for the first time to create pages.

Being nicknamed by some as Graveyard Plus it remains to be seen whether brands will embrace this new opportunity now open to them. When compared to Facebook’s 800 million users, Google + ‘s 40 million pales by comparison. However, what remains interesting is that by clever use of the “Circles” facility with Google Plus, brands will be able to group it’s members, handy for grouped or segmented marketing messages.

Essentially, and only at first glance, the facility imitates what is already available on Facebook. One thing about which we are quite confident is that Google will enable content to rank within it’s search engine, which conversely has taken some time for Facebook content.

Rate This! The emotional side of rating systems

I have been thinking a lot recently about online ratings systems and how we use them to express our feelings about a piece of content.

It is quite old news but I think Youtube’s decision to move away from a 5 star rating system to a simple thumbs up thumbs down system was really interesting.

The 5 star rating system largely resulted in viewers voting videos 5 star or 1 star. The graph of star ratings for Youtube was so binary it made a lot of sense to change the rating system to reflect that. Even now the majority of videos you will see on Youtube will have like votes far outweighing the dislike votes.

I guess the response to a video you don’t like is more likely to be closing the tab rather than spending the time to rate it.

Youtube Rating Graph
A graph showing how votes in a five star rating system were distributed on Youtube

Facebook has taken this system even further and only offers a like button with no option for negative feedback. Presumably this is because Facebook wants to encourage positive behavior and is aware that more people will rate something positively than will take the time to be negative.

These two networks might lead you to thinking the 5 star rating system is dead and that simplification is the answer. However it really depends on the type of content and the presentation of the system. For example Trip advisor’s five star rating system is presented with the semantic terms and radio buttons rather than a clear set of stars. As you can see below the ratings of a typical item tend to have a wider distribution spread.

Trip Advisor uses semantics to anchor it’s rating system
By anchoring the rating system with emotional terms it makes the rater think about which word best aligns with their feelings towards their experience rather than simply if they liked it or not.

It is also worth noting the vast difference between experience a 2 minute Youtube video and spending several days on holiday. The holiday is much more likely to create a variety of opinions that requires a finer degree of scale as opposed to the consumption of a short video.

The rating system can also be integral to the experience of the content itself. For example a new social network Canv.as has an interesting take on the like/dislike rating system.

Canvas upvote rating system

Canv.as is a network about images with users posting funny/interesting pictures and then remixing, editing and responding to them in kind. Users can downvote any item with a thumbs down but are given a choice from 9 upvotes.

Each upvote is worth the same and in terms of rating it is no different to the thumbs up of a Youtube video. However by giving each upvote it’s own visual identity the user is able to reflect the reason for their rating without needing to leave a comment.

Whether the rated image made them happy, shocked or laugh out loud it can all be encompassed with one vote. It allows for a wider range of expression without needing the user to think of where the piece of content ranks in comparison to others.

It is also worth noting that these are not just buttons to click on each image but must be dragged and dropped onto the content which is a much more deliberate and satisfying experience than pressing a button.

Giving your users a rating system can be much more than giving them a set of numbers with which to rate your content. The experience of how they can rate and how the system is presented can dramatically change behaviour. I would be really interested to hear if you have seen any sites that have a unique or different system for rating content.

This blog post was written by Glenn White while at Qube Media. Glenn now works for Brandwatch.